Proportionally to our act of war still leaves them for carrying out an act of war if they want to. It’s a word war they are winning, so politically there’s that. But still the rancid tangerine I claiming he’ll destroy them if they retaliate. It’s like someone said the US expects them to attack us with super soakers while we use drone strikes in retaliation. Everyone needs to get over this he was a bad dude so it’s justified, it really wasn’t justified, and we have done the same he’s accused of.
Maybe not recently supporting terrorists but using proxies to engage in war is really our style and has been for decades. They will be in their right to retaliate when they do. I don’t want to be on a list if I’m right, but an eye for an eye would put someone in trumps cabinet as the likely target, who would be the equivalent?